Posts Tagged ‘facebook’

Why I think Facebook Sucks@

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponSave on DeliciousDigg ThisSubmit to redditShare on MyspaceShare via email

I’ve been itching to bitch about everybody’s favorite former-Myspace-wannabe, current-LinkedIn-wannabe Facebook.

Maybe I’m one of the last few sane people, but I’m not active on Facebook. I won’t spend time or waste time there. If you send me a stupid invite or I receive an email saying you added me to your little network there, you go right into the virtual trash. I have plenty of people who ask me why I won’t jump on the Facebook bandwagon. I just tell them it sucks and that I have more useful ways to spend my time (and more fun ways to waste it). But here you go… my top ten reasons Facebook sucks:

1. It’s incredibly juvenile compared to other networks, yet I constantly see people using it for business reasons. Use unprofessional services, and that’s exactly how it makes you look. If you think it’s professional to “poke” your colleagues online, maybe you still belong chasing 10 year old boys around the schoolyard.

2. Facebook is a fad. Yes, a FAD!!! You couldn’t give a single legitimate argument to prove otherwise (and don’t try to feed me that crap line about social networking being around long enough to no longer be a fad… Facebook, a single company, doesn’t equate to “social networking”). People who waste their time chasing fads (especially in marketing) always get burned, wasting more time than they can justify in the long run.

3. Frankly, there are better ways to reach your target audience (unless you’re primarily targeting students – despite their changes, that’s still the primary userbase. If you’re targeting them, Facebook may be an alright tool for you. If you’re not, forget it.). If you’re not putting in the effort to find the best ways to reach your target audience, you’re not doing your job. In most cases, Facebook won’t even come close.

4. Facebook doesn’t even know who the hell they are, yet people are willing to put their professional identity even partly in their hands. Guess what. Their first model sucked. They’re toying with something new. Do you really want to invest a lot of time and effort into networking through a company who couldn’t even remain faithful to their own market? I sure as hell don’t.

5. PR professionals should know hype when they see it. Enough said on that front.

6. Most people I know who are on Facebook are on a variety of other social networks as well. Newsflash: most have no real added benefit. If you’re using Facebook as just one of several social networking sites, you have way too much time on your hands that would probably be better spent elsewhere.

7. The company has a history of not being terribly considerate of their users’ privacy. They may have privacy options available now, but do you really trust a company like that when it comes to your business? If you do, that’s great. Dense perhaps, but great.

8. The fact that they try to act like their own little virtual world is just annoying. Any site that forces you to register to really get a feel for it is just pathetic. It’s a simple marketing tactic on their end to rev up their member numbers (and supposed worth?) whether people actually use the site or not.

9. Speaking of their “value,” I’m sick of hearing about it. All the talk about whether or not they’d be sold and for how much is what started all of Facebook buzz in the first place (despite the fact that most of the newer die hard fans don’t even realize where the sudden mass interest came from).

10. Frankly, Facebook is so “been there done that.” They’re dated. They’re not “cool” anymore. The early adopters have come, gone, and moved onto better (and more useful) things, and what you have now is this overwhelming group of stale business-minded folks who still buy into the hype. Why? Because most people are too lazy to actually research a marketing / PR tactic before jumping on the bandwagon when it’s all everyone’s talking about. That’s the nature of being a fad. The only good thing about Facebook is the fact that fads die.

Now don’t get me wrong… I’m not completely knocking all social networks. I’ve used Myspace for quite some time for business, and very effectively. But there’s a huge difference between me using Myspace and most of the folks using Facebook in any kind of a networking / marketing capacity: I know my market, and I chose my tools completely based on the most effective ways of reaching them. I do music publicity work and run a music zine for independent artists. There’s simply still no better place to find them, and that particular market isn’t the type to pick up and move to other social networks. Most people I know using Facebook are totally clueless about how their market uses (or doesn’t use) the site or social networking in general. That’s just bad business.

I don’t expect most people to agree with me. I wouldn’t be surprised if I offended quite a few people who are so slow as to still buy into the fad without any real vision for the future potential or lack thereof. But Facebook isn’t worth any more time than it took to write this rant (if even that). There are much better options out there. If you use generic tools like Facebook for marketing, you’ll never get the best reach and value for the time commitment. Like with anything else, know your market or audience and find the most effective ways to reach them. “Well everyone else is doing it” just isn’t a good excuse… especially in business.

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponSave on DeliciousDigg ThisSubmit to redditShare on MyspaceShare via email
 

Facebook terms of service /ownership of your content

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponSave on DeliciousDigg ThisSubmit to redditShare on MyspaceShare via email

Well here’s one for those of us that naively think we own the photos etc that we store in social networks and other places on the Web. A short while ago Facebook decided to change its terms of service. cnn.com/technology summarises these changes as:

The company deleted a sentence from the old Terms of Use. That sentence said Facebook could not claim any rights to original content that a user uploaded once the user closed his or her account. It replaced it with: “You may remove your User Content from the Site at any time. … (H)owever, you acknowledge that the Company may retain archived copies of your User Content.”


PCWorld
reports:

the changes were actually made in early February but not widely noticed until Sunday, when The Consumerist’s Chris Walters stumbled upon the subtly shifted language. The section in question explains how Facebook has an “irrevocable, perpetual” license to use your “name, likeness, and image” in essentially any way, including within promotions or external advertising.

I first heard about the changes (and the reaction) through Twitter (the value of Twitter really is increasing with its ability to really show what people are thinking about now).
At the time I didn’t pay a huge amount of attention to it. I understand users of Facebook were notified of the changes via a message on their home page although I don’t remember seeing anything – maybe I was half asleep when that one flew by. Following the ensuing fracas and back-down by Facebook, it is again my understanding that users were notified via a message on their homepage that Facebook were reverting to their old terms of service. Now I definitely don’t remember seeing that one. Maybe I should look at Facebook when I am more awake. Again, it was Twitter to the rescue and I found out about the back-down through Twitter (Note to Facebook – you really should’ve tried harder to acquire them!).

Anyway, you’d think by now Facebook would be a bit more sensitive to the feelings of their community – Remember the Beacon fiasco?
As valued as Facebook is to many of us, we really do need to be aware of concerns over privacy and ownership. Obviously others think so too such as the EU and this from Canada.

So, is Facebook alone in its approach to privacy/ownership or is this just a feature of the other large social networks? The afore mentioned PCWorld post seeks to shed some light on this too.

Looking at this in a positive way, it is great to see that Facebook did respond to the community reaction about the changes and reverted back to the previous terms of service. I am sure there are many others who could and should learn from this ability and willingness to respond to the community rather than continue on regardless.

This whole issue has been a reminder to me that we really do need to develop our awareness and understanding of these issues as we strive to survive and thrive in a 21st Century environment. Digital literacy/citizenship is so much more than knowing how to use technologies effectively – we really need to understand the implications of what we are doing in the short and long-term. Here’s another interesting post from ZDNet on ‘Facebook and Privacy Chernobyls’. If, like many you are stuck with Facebook whether you like it or not because that’s where your network is, here’s some advice from Lifehacker on privacy settings you should know.

When I first started to consider the whole issue, my first response was something along the lines of .. well, I’m stuck with Facebook because that’s the only network I share with a number of important contacts for me but I don’t like what they’re up to so I will have to store my photos (yes, I still cling to the notion that they are mine) somewhere else and just link to them. Now, if only I could find a trustworthy service that will guarantee that they will remain mine.

This gets interesting for me in another area that I am looking at and that is eportfolios. Like a number of people, I have been exploring the notion that an eportfolio model may be a set of services from around the Web that are aggregated together in some fashion for management, presentation etc. Now if you are storing digital artefacts for you eportfolio in any number of places (eg Flickr, Google Docs, YouTube, Slideshare, blogs etc) you really do need to be aware of the terms and conditions associated with those services if you are going to effectively manage and own those artefacts.

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponSave on DeliciousDigg ThisSubmit to redditShare on MyspaceShare via email
 

Facebook ! a success myth or a huge scam?

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponSave on DeliciousDigg ThisSubmit to redditShare on MyspaceShare via email

Many people think of facebook as the hugest success story, the innovation in the world of social networking ! Even though myspace was there and others were there, but facebook had its way!

Here are my few cents on this subject !

A social networking with a group of brainiacs to adventure such a risk and yet gain a success, did they lack programming tips ? Cause since they started, and bug after another was discovered.

Mainly, those bugs, are to invade your privacy, and methods people found ot by tricks or by chance to gain access to other people’s profiles.

Let’s face it, if it wasnt public, it would have been just another match making website and people wouldnt dare to introduce themselves and get rejections before they even know who they are trying to be friends with.

This is the case where facebook succeeded, they let, by chance or by intention, people sneak peak others profiles, and when they made it harder, they let other options appear here and there, just to allow you and your network to expand.

Whats the catch ?
Besides the obvious reason, which is popularity and monies coming in, the method approached as i think google invented, give free stuff till people are stuffed, and then sell ad space !
That worked well…
Whats the other catch?
This is personal opinion and dont take my word on it… but i do tend to try things before i signup using my real info and stuff like that !
My first trial , years ago was using a true email address of mine yet with fake info..
Next step, went to update those info , wow… you cant change your name

Why would a social networking disallow you from changing your name? you can simply create a new one… but again, phsycologicaly speaking, most users would tend to type their real names, and when they do its saved,  it just gives fb more accurate users base about their users.
But why would they tend to do that ? Why would they intentionally and publicly post your info and strive to make it as much accurate as it is, while most people used to tend to hide their identities online, fb has blown the cover !
Is it why other networks are striving to buy it ?
Or maybe why fbi didnt have issues or problems getting a deal to collect information from it?
We have heard for many times, many local agencies, do collect info using fb !
Think of it,
You have been there, posted openly about their religious views, political standings and networking views.
Have you been online in the past years ? Do you remember how much would it have took you to trade pics and images and videos or even real phone numbers and contact information with people you met online ?
Oh well, now you are posting them, by will, and publicly !

Now lets see, facebook yet claims to have its privacy as number one, for a novice user, this is a scam !
What do you expect from a novice user to go to security and privacy settings to disallow others from viewing his information unless they became friends with him, while the default setting are “viewable by network” which alone is a public posting.

Nothing easier than going to same network even if u had to create an extra fb account for that to check it out, depending that many people forget to change it.

Photos by friends of friends? What the heck… so my friend can post a photo tagged, and that will lead to my photos my albums and things it should be private

PS: if you really want things private , you dont post them online

Am only discussing the contradictions in the privacy “theory” and the fact that you are by will, posting them online, just because you read its private… when facebook default setup, is actually setup to make your profile viewable.
Am not going to post links on how to contrust urls to view parts of non friends profiles, but many are already there on the net, and just using a slight url changes, you mostly gain a bit or more info than you should have .
Recently, the uconnect social networking owners have re-initiated the law suit regarding the idea of facebook being stolen by the owner of fb from his roomates few years back…  but we have witnessed few of such stories and whatever the case, they are led no where…

Here are few horror stories from the past till the day …
http://www.xssed.com/news/81/Facebooks_Reset_Password_page_suffers_major_XSS_flaw/

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/23/facebook_xss_flaw/

http://www.securityfocus.com/brief/786?ref=rss

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7090096.stm

http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view.bg?articleid=167529

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/06/26/sniffing_private_facebook_info/

As there is no need to update or list the old no more working bugs for now, maybe ill be updating this post about newer bugs or even current tips and tricks about fb, which i use shyly !

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponSave on DeliciousDigg ThisSubmit to redditShare on MyspaceShare via email